|
I Am a Strange Loop | 
 enlarge | Author: Douglas R. Hofstadter
Publisher: Basic Books
Category: Book
List Price: $16.95
Buy New: $4.95
You Save: $12.00 (71%)
New (48) Used (18) Collectible (1) from $3.14
Rating:  76 reviews
Sales Rank: 221074
Media: Paperback
Edition: Reprint
Pages: 436
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 9 x 5.9 x 1.2
ISBN: 0465030793
Dewey Decimal Number: 153
EAN: 9780465030798
ASIN: 0465030793
Publication Date: July 7, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: CHARITY SALE!! New--minimal shelfwear. 100% of the proceeds benefit the literacy efforts of Books for America.
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Can thought arise out of matter? Can self, soul, consciousness, “I” arise out of mere matter? If it cannot, then how can you or I be here? I Am a Strange Loop argues that the key to understanding selves and consciousness is the “strange loop”—a special kind of abstract feedback loop inhabiting our brains. The most central and complex symbol in your brain is the one called “I.” The “I” is the nexus in our brain, one of many symbols seeming to have free will and to have gained the paradoxical ability to push particles around, rather than the reverse. How can a mysterious abstraction be real—or is our “I” merely a convenient fiction? Does an “I” exert genuine power over the particles in our brain, or is it helplessly pushed around by the laws of physics? These are the mysteries tackled in I Am a Strange Loop, Douglas Hofstadter’s first book-length journey into philosophy since Goedel, Escher, Bach. Compulsively readable and endlessly thought-provoking, this is a moving and profound inquiry into the nature of mind.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 71 more reviews...
 Mumble Jumble Ramble November 20, 2008
Ventura Angelo (Brescia, Lombardia Italy)
A scientist doesn't talk of "soul", an unscientific term of undefined meaning. You can't dismiss the "lower Level" called brain, because without a brain we cannot feel nor think. I think the problem of consciousness won't be resolved by loopy conundrums and puzzling analogies. I, for one, don't think a child of two has "less soul" than an adult: a child has a mind (mind, not soul) less educated, informed and developed. Nor do I think that, because a deceased loved one survives in my memory and dreams, he/she shares consciousness with me. This is a consolatory fancy; if the Author is comforted by believing it, by all means, let him be, but there's nothing "scientific" in such a notion.
 I Am A Strange Loop November 17, 2008
Paul M. Murphy (Cincinnati)
How real is X to you...the moment you start taking X for granted, then it would seem you would consider X's reality highly dubious.
This, a book of analogies and metaphors, presents a plethora of academic notions in a down to earth way, spinning science subjects such as physics, mathematics at the logical level, chemistry, psychology, humanities, and a touch of theology, to describe the human experience, which Hofstadter calls a Strange loop. He brings in a lot of his humble personality and subtle sense of humor to help the reader feel like his best friend is telling you about a crazy dream he had the night before. In keeping with the spirit of the book I recognize that every reaction or review would carry the bias of the reviewer's life experience, whether that be one of science, business, art, sports, spiritual, or just a plain ordinary person...most of us. I am going with the human experience henceforth. With regard to the human experience Hofstadter suggests that in order to perceive our universe, you must have a soul, described in the book as that with the capability to interpret the symbols of the universe.
From small to large, while there is a DNA make up that begins things, Hofstadter puts forward the notion, backed with enough thought to be the foundation of a thesis, but not enough to make a boring academic read, that DNA must be capable eventually through development in chemical communication of powering enough energy to a.) Interpret symbols, b.) Share these symbols with other beings, and c.) Care about the other being. Please understand not I did not state the possibility of a soul to be strictly the domain human beings. Hofstadter, in no way suggests the human being as the center of thought but in many ways implies that souls are not dependent on the human form. This is clearly in sync with Emerson, and Jesus to name a couple souls, but is scientifically based in the 21st century.
To see the complete review do a keyword search on cigarroomofbooks
 chatty and personal, rather disappointing November 9, 2008
T. Burket (Potomac, MD United States)
Once again, Hofstadter brings his unusual and very personal style to a serious subject. As with the title, "I" is a major player here, with stories, ruminations and specifics on what he thinks as a conscious human and a researcher. In many cases, I felt like we were almost in a dialog together.
The book is too long and repetitious, with its essence only a few key points. There is a complex thread on KG, incompleteness, Russell and how all that applies to looks and being inside and outside the system. It's a tough subject and the author makes a solid shot.
The other main topic is the degree of consciousness from humans to insects, with the lowly mosquito making many appearances. Hofstadter believes that consciousness gradually appears as you go up the chain, with no concrete dividing line. Fair enough.
Given that premise, he doesn't get into how that applies to different abilities and perceptions within humans, either as fully grown adults or as developing humans in the womb. A serious assessment of when humans become conscious and how consciousness evolves as we age (to be fair, he does use Ronald Reagan as a proxy for late-state decline) would have been welcome. Perhaps his highly-visible liberal views would have made that too dangerous, with a simple example being his brief mention of "The Bell Curve" that could have been more seriously assessed.
The riff on consciousness at a distance and replication was one of the highlights. A segue into science fiction concepts could have been a treat in his hands, such as Star Trek's "Borg" and so many other ideas of collective intelligence. How much technology could I insert into the brain and still be a conscious human, especially one who is still "me"?
Finally, computer science and artificial intelligence, one of Hofstadter's own fields, has quite the history of debate on what is intelligence. He is quite clear that many systems are far from conscious, such as chess players and feedback systems, without pushing the envelope for future possibilities. Do some pushing.
The book has its moments, and what a fertile mind he has. On this subject, I prefer Steven Pinker and more traditional writers.
 Goedel, Escher Bach Lite October 20, 2008
keesp (Utrecht, the Netherlands)
Title says all!
Too much wit, too little novelty since his seminal 1979 book...
should have cashed out while he was ahead October 18, 2008
Grayden JF Solman
If this were written by any other author it would be dismissed as more inane crank-speak. Unfortunately, it was written by the author of a prior, stunning work (GEB) - which somehow earns it immunity against ridicule.
Let me summarize:
1. Take the cutesy, at times tedious, analogies and dialogues from GEB.
2. Construct new analogies by combining last night's dream with a childrens' cartoon, and crank the folksy up to 11.
3. Replace all of the informative / insightful components from GEB (who needs them anyway?) with the results of 2.
4. Publish.
Everyone has pet theories about consciousness. Most of us have the decency not to publish books about it.
|
|
|
SEO and Marketing TipsBETA RELEASE | |
